[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 > packets) to keep > a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a > routed link., this > can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues. > > OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense. > > Why was EIGRP designed this way?
Simplicity?? Less network traffic? But I question your premise. EIGRP wouldn't send to a neighbor that wasn't feasible, would it? Is EIGRP really more susceptible to black holes than OSPF? Maybe I'll rattle some experts and we'll get a good discussion going on this. :-) Priscilla > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Ken Farrington > Global Networks, Barclays Capital, 5 The North Colonnade, > Canary > Wharf, London, E14 4BB > * Tel : 020 7773 3550 > * Mob : 07768-866655 > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For more information about Barclays Capital, please > visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. > > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore the > Barclays > Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of > this > message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus > programmes, > it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever > that is > caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions > presented are > solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent > those of the > Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the > Barclays > Group for operational or business reasons. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59191&t=59186 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
