try adding ip tacacs-source 

to specify an interface that you know you can reach FROM your TACACS server

maybe you dont have a route back to the router from server to the source
that the router is using for tacacs requests


""Amer""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Okay I've got my login authentication, authorization and accounting
working
> on most of my switches and router through a ACS (TACACS+).  But I have
this
> one router that gives me an "% Error in authentication" message as soon as
I
> put in my username.  It doesn't even allow me to put in a password.  The
> only way I can get into it is through the local account that I have
created
> on it.  I've checked a similar router (same IOS, exact same
configuration),
> and it works okay.... so what can I look for to troubleshoot this
problem??
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Here is the config on the router:
>
> aaa new-model
> aaa authentication login default local tacacs+
> aaa authentication enable default enable tacacs+
> aaa authorization exec default tacacs+ local
> aaa authorization network default none
> aaa accounting update newinfo
> aaa accounting exec default start-stop tacacs+
> aaa accounting commands 15 default start-stop tacacs+
> aaa accounting network default start-stop tacacs+
>
> P.S.  Does anyone know of a way to filter out the commands that can be
> accounted for at the ACS?  At the moment, the accounting is working a
great
> but it accounts for every command that's put it. I have an access list on
> one of my router that is about 150 lines long and gets modified constantly
> and every command is accounted for in the ACS Accounting.  I'm trying to
see
> if there's a way to filter out that particular access-list and not account
> for it everytime.  Thanks again.
>
> Amer




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59422&t=59393
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to