Great Daniel, But I need clarification on this part me be if u have some documnet or some link please send me the link.......Thanx for the help.anybody has comments since it seems a trivial question but not. Regards, Munit
Daniel Cotts wrote: > I seem to recall that the Administrative Distance of static routes that > specify a local interface has differed between 0 and 1 depending on IOS > version. I have a hand written note that (I think) says the value is 0 for > 11.3 and 12.0; but is now 1 for newer IOS versions. If true, your results > will depend on which IOS your routers are running. > I'd appreciate comments for those who have more specific info. I'll see if I > can find time to experiment. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Munit Singla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 4:57 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Strange problem of route table [7:59533] > > > > > > Hi Godswill, > > Thanx for reply.I agree with u,but Still the doubt persists > > if both the > > commands > > are used then both entries come to the route table.As per > > your and mine > > theory > > also only better administrative distance should come into the > > route table,but > > here both are introduced into the route table ,as it seems it has > > administrative > > distance of 1 for default gateway of its own > > interface(obviosly zero is > > preffered then one)? > > Why both entries in route table. > > As confusion is creating from different answers so please > > reply ,so that all > > confusions are over. > > Regards, > > Munit > > > > Godswill Oletu wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Static routes can either have the AD of 1 or 0 depending on > > the way you add > > > them to your router. > > > e.g lates RouterA interface FE0=192.168.0.1/27 and it is > > connected to > > > RouterB FE1=192.168.0.2/27 & FE3=10.1.0.1/24. > > > > > > To define route to 10.1.0.1/24 on RouterA you have two methods. > > > > > > 1. RouterA# IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 (AD=1) > > > 2. RouterA#IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 FE0 (AD=0) > > > > > > If both commands are entered option 2 will be the prefered route. > > > > > > So you are correct, choose the one you prefer, it also > > depends whether you > > > want to do load balancing, floating static route, etc... > > > > > > Regards. > > > Godswill Oletu > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Munit Singla > > > To: > > > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:44 AM > > > Subject: Strange problem of route table [7:59533] > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Can anybody tell me when I add static route to my default > > network it > > shows > > > > with Administrative distance of 1,whereas we know that > > static routes to > > > our > > > > own interface have AD. of zero. > > > > Example > > > > C 10.77.152.128/25 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 > > > > S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.77.152.129 > > > > is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0 > > > > > > > > Its showing here with administrative distance of 1 the > > route with default > > > > gateway of FastEthernet1/0. > > > > Please do clear me where I am wrong > > > > Thanx in advance > > > > Munit Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59630&t=59533 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
