Going back to something from the previous thread... (LaWR wrote...) >BTW, I am not so sure I agree that lab writing is a CCIE skill set. I'd like >you to elaborate more on why you believe that the ability to write a good >lab is indicative of CCIE level skill. Maybe some other folks have some >thoughts on this as well. (Howard responded...) Well, maybe not commercial-grade lab writing, but if you can't write a lab with functions that build on one another, how are you going to "get inside" the minds of the lab developers?
JMCL: So Howard, does that mean that you feel that lab writing is a skill set required to pass the CCIE lab, rather than necessarily being a skill set that a CCIE "should" have? Or do you feel that lab writing is a skill set that is also useful in a commercial environment (not a certification-oriented environment, but an enterprise design/troubleshooting environment, say)? Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > Well, as a first step to civility, I've changed the name of the > thread to something neutral. > > > At 3:19 PM +0000 12/30/02, MikeS wrote: > >Howard, I second the vote for a discussion.. assuming all > parties can keep > >it civil and not have degenerate into the *mine is better then > yours*... I > >know different vendors have different goals and ways to obtain > the goals > >with their products. It would interesting to hear about the > differences. > > > >MikeS > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59986&t=59970 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
