I tried to reboot all the routers, but still gave me the same result, then I
tried "no ospf 200" then reconfigure the ospf, and it worked! (weird??)
Then I tried the nssa configuration with "area 1 nssa def" on R2, I could
see the O*N2 entry on R3, but only one entry instead of 2:
O*N2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.1.33
Is that because of N2 type?
Also I tried to create metric-type 1 route on R1, and in R2 routing table, I
could see E1 entry, but in R3, still N2 entry, how can I redistribute N1
type to nssa?
Thanks
Wei
----- Original Message -----
From: Wei Zhu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 4:44 PM
Subject: OSPF stub/stub no-summary O*IA routing table entry difference?
The Router connections are as following, R1 has 1 frame relay circuit to
R2, R2 has 2 frame relay circuits to R3, R2 is the ABR, R1 in Area 0, and R3
in area 1.
R1
/
/
R2
/ /
/ /
R3
On R1, there is a redistribute entry. The two ip address on R2 to R3 side
are 192.168.1.33/28, 192.168.1.17/28. The IOS is 12.2(1d).
When enable area 1 as a stub area, the O* IA entry on R3:
O*IA 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1563] via 192.168.1.33
0.0.0.0/0 [110/1563] via 192.168.1.17
When enable area 1 as a totally stub area, the O* IA entry on R3:
O*IA 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1563] via 192.168.1.33 (the 192.168.1.17 entry
disappeared)
It seems that in totally stub area(stub no-summary), the default traffic
cannot be load balanced between the two circuits.
Can anyone explain this?
Thanks
Wei
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60084&t=60084
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
