On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Andy Barkl wrote: > > This is a double-NAT scenario. Is this possible? > > > > I have tried adding all the usual static routes for the router and PIX > > with no success. Any first-hand experience or ideas? > > > > 10.0.0.0--->PIX--->192.168.1.0--->router--->Internet
Why do the double NAT? That's just unneeded overhead. Why not just place the PIX on two subnets and allow it to route between them? Then use the NAT on the router. I do a similar setup for my wireless behind a NAT device and an ethernet drop from the school. 192.168.100.x --- PIX --- 192.168.1.x --- router --- Internet Andrew --- http://www.andrewsworld.net/ ICQ: 2895251 Cisco Certified Network Associate "Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself." Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60331&t=60307 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
