>Howard,
>
>We'd all like to see a comprehensive QOS chart.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Kym

They are Word tables in several different papers of mine. Just trying 
to paste them into email text results in something unreadable. 
Anyone good at
reformatting tables to ASCII, when table cells have multiple lines?

>
>
>
>>From: "Jonathan V Hays" 
>>Reply-To: "Jonathan V Hays" 
>>To: 
>>Subject: RE: Small Minded QOS
>>Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:17:53 -0500
>>
>>Howard,
>>
>>I, for one, would be quite interested in such a comparative table.
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
>>Jonathan
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
>>Howard C. Berkowitz
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 3:47 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Small Minded QOS
>>
>>
>>At 7:39 PM +0000 1/8/03, Jennifer Bellucci wrote:
>>>Hello
>>>
>>>Can someone tell me where I can find every single QOS formula for all
>>>the QOS techniques in one document, prefer it if it was one page.
>>>Please do not send me the link to QOS on cco.
>>
>>Could you clarify what you mean by "formula"?  When I hear that, I
>>think of the derivation of the algorithms, and, certainly for things
>>like RED and WFQ, these were published in scientific papers of many
>>pages and equations. Indeed, if you go into the literature, you'll
>>find that what we may call things are actually approximations ("true"
>>WFQ is a theoretical abstraction; what we call WFQ is more like
>>Self-Clocked WFQ).
>>
>>Now, if you are thinking of a comparative table of what the various
>>IOS QOS mechanisms do, that's something I might be able to dig up. .
>>.
>rd
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* 
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60710&t=60710
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to