You have to put a "bandwidth" statement under the tunnel interfaces as well, with a higher value than FR.
Aurelian Georgescu -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: : Influencing EIGRP to use GRE tunnels over Serial link [7:60834] Hello all, I have a question. I have gre tunnels going through MPLS running 1.544mbps, running EIGRP. The secondary links are Frame Relay links running at 256kbps per link. Presently EIGRP has calculated the best link to be the Sprint Link as there are bandwidth statements in the frame relay subinterface on the remote site: Remote Site In Tampa: interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point description "Connect to Seattle" bandwidth 256 ip address 192.168.228.253 255.255.255.0 no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable frame-relay interface-dlci 41 interface Tunnel1 description "Tampa Tunnel to Seattle" ip address 10.0.48.6 255.255.255.252 tunnel source Serial0/1 tunnel destination 64.200.134.18 ! The Tamp Site connects with Seattle Hub with these configs: interface Tunnel1 description "Seattle Tunnel to Tampa" ip address 10.0.48.5 255.255.255.252 tunnel source Serial2/0 tunnel destination 64.200.118.162 end interface Serial0/0.8 point-to-point description "Seattle to Tampa" bandwidth 256 ip address 192.168.228.254 255.255.255.0 no ip route-cache no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable frame-relay interface-dlci 39 I believe the best way to influence EIGRP would be to add a bandwidth statement to the tunnel or the interface to which the tunnel is applied to. One other question. T1 1.544mbps would be 193000 in the bandwidth statement?.. believe so ..but having a brain fart right now. Thank you for your help. Cheers, Jamie Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60837&t=60837 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
