Added the bandwidth statement to the tunnel and to the interface. As well added the interface 66.200.x.x to eigrp statement. Problem is that the link will not use the 10.x.x.x in the table.
Has anyone tried to influence EIGRP to use a tunnel 10.x.x.x instead of a 192.x.x.x frame relay link? Any ideas how to get the routing across the tunnel instead of the frame relay? cheers, Jamie ----- Original Message ----- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Date: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:58 am Subject: Influencing EIGRP to use GRE tunnels over Serial link [7:60833] > Hello all, > > I have a question. I have gre tunnels going through MPLS running > 1.544mbps,running EIGRP. The secondary links are Frame Relay > links running at 256kbps > per link. Presently EIGRP has calculated the best link to be the > SprintLink as there are bandwidth statements in the frame relay > subinterface on > the remote site: > > Remote Site In Tampa: > interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point > description "Connect to Seattle" > bandwidth 256 > ip address 192.168.228.253 255.255.255.0 > no ip mroute-cache > no cdp enable > frame-relay interface-dlci 41 > > interface Tunnel1 > description "Tampa Tunnel to Seattle" > ip address 10.0.48.6 255.255.255.252 > tunnel source Serial0/1 > tunnel destination 64.200.134.18 > ! > The Tamp Site connects with Seattle Hub with these configs: > > interface Tunnel1 > description "Seattle Tunnel to Tampa" > ip address 10.0.48.5 255.255.255.252 > tunnel source Serial2/0 > tunnel destination 64.200.118.162 > end > > interface Serial0/0.8 point-to-point > description "Seattle to Tampa" > bandwidth 256 > ip address 192.168.228.254 255.255.255.0 > no ip route-cache > no ip mroute-cache > no cdp enable > frame-relay interface-dlci 39 > > I believe the best way to influence EIGRP would be to add a bandwidth > statement to the tunnel or the interface to which the tunnel is > applied to. > > One other question. T1 1.544mbps would be 193000 in the bandwidth > statement?.. believe so ..but having a brain fart right now. > > Thank you for your help. > > Cheers, > > Jamie > Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60852&t=60852 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
