It is just a static NAT of the internal address to an external address, in
this case they happen to be the same address 

... sometimes used in conjunction with conduits/ACL's to permit certain
monitoring/syslog/tftp/etc. traffic to external devices (edge routers, for
ex.) without exposing the internal hosts globally.  However, this seems to
not by your case as you are using external IP's.

In this case, it may be an example of a network that was not behind a
firewall originally, but has now been moved behind one ... and they didn't
want to bother re-addressing :).



Just my $.01
Thanks!
TJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-----Original Message-----
From: Arni V. Skarphedinsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Question [7:60941]

Hi

Can anyone please tell me what the point of the following command is

static (inside,outside) 157.157.146.13 157.157.146.13 netmask
255.255.255.255 0 0

Same IP address on the inside and the outside, I have seen this used on
production networks, but can not figure out why, can anyone please explain.
******************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally 
privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the 
intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended 
recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, 
distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken 
in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not 
the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this 
message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, 
and any copies thereof from your system.
******************************************************************************




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60951&t=60941
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to