""The Long and Winding Road""  wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> well, now that I've set it up, looked at it, and given it some thought,
the
> answer is really quite simple.
> being a simple person myself, I like it when answers are simple. think
> "classful nature of eigrp"
>
> see below
>
>
> ""Wei Zhu""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > ---EIGRP 100--(S0)---R1---(S1)--BGP AS 200---
> >
> > R1
> > S0 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.240
> > S1 172.22.2.1 255.255.255.0
> > S0 side run EIGRP, S1 side run BGP
> >
> > (1)
> > router eigrp 200
> > network 192.168.1.0
> >
> > router bgp
> > nei XXXX remote-as XXX
> >
> > R1 will send 192.168.1.0 route info through S0, but won't send the
> > 172.22.2.0 network info.
> >
> > (2)
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 S1
> >
> > router eigrp 200
> > network 192.168.1.0
> > redistrib static
> >
> > Everything works fine
> >
> > (3)
> > If using network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static info as:
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 S1
> >
> > router eigrp 200
> > network 192.168.1.0
> > network 0.0.0.0
> >
> > In addition of distribute the 0.0.0.0, R1 will also distribute
172.22.0.0
> > (summury) network info through S0
>
> first of all, you are not seeing the whole picture because of the limited
> numbers of interfaces you have in your basic setup.
>
> second of all, let me ask you a question. what exactly is 0.0.0.0?
>
> thirdly, having answered and understood what exactly 0.0.0.0 really
> represents, let me ask you another question. what happens when you put the
> entry "network 0.0.0.0" into the eigrp process? will eigrp still work if
you
> were to now remove the "network 192.168.1.0" statement? why not?
>
> this is starting to feel like another homily.
>
>
> > It will also put 172.22.0.0/16 null0 route entry into its routing table.
>
> nature of the beast. I don't believe it is true of all protocols, but some
> of them will automatically place a summary to null 0 when a summary is
> advertised out. This is done as proof against black holes and helps
prevent
> routing loops
>
> BTW, I enjoy your posts. Keep up the good work.
>
> >
> > Can anyone explain why this happens?


oh, you know what, while composing a reply to cebuano, I realized - you
probably have automaticic summarization enabled under eigrp

enter the command "no auto-summary" and watch the staic to null 0 disappear.


>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > Wei




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61186&t=61186
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to