> Split tunneling has been enabled up until now. Does this mean you have recently DISabled split tunneling??
If not, does the newest client 3.6? have a function for keeping traffic sourced from the internet from using the Split-tunneling host from acting as a mirror to breach the corporate network?? >From what I understand, enabling the Split Tunnel feature is a BAD option, Cisco just created it for those clients that didn't want their remote users surfing the net via the corporate network. Can anybody clarify on any of these points?? -Mark -----Original Message----- From: Kim Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Question [7:61148] Basically it performs as per stated. We have VPN users that come into our concentrator from all over North American and abroad. They have used a variety of cable, dsl, dial-up providers and for the most part do not have any issues. Split tunnelling has been enabled up until now. As for private networks (home networks) we have some home users utilizing Nexlands and Ugates and probably other "Internet Sharing Boxes". Some cable companies have had compatibiity issues with this but I believe the most recent version of software on those boxes has corrected the problem. As a test while at Nanog I was able to log into my internal network from a wireless laptop. All and all it is a pretty solid client. Kim / Zukee Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61202&t=61148 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
