At one point I tried putting the specific interface subnets in our EIGRP process but it didn't want to cooperate. Besides, it's much easier to put a /16 in the process once on a 5500/6500 than 60+ different subnets. I guess I prefer the easy way out. :-)
>>> "The Long and Winding Road" 01/18/03 10:16AM >>> based on a recent thread regarding the 0.0.0.0 network since about 12.0 or so, when placing networks into EIGRP, one can use a wildcard mask. [snip] I find the notation that 4.0.0.0/24 is subnetted with one subnet interesting Note also that the wildcard mask bits must be contiguous, which is one of the idiot proofing features introduced in 12.0 Takes all the fun out of wildcard masking, both for EIGRP and for OSPF. As we discussed elsewhere, the command "network 0.0.0.0" places all connected interfaces, and thus all connected networks, into the eigrp process. if automatic summarization is enabled, then routes to null0 are generated. I'm not sure there is a lot of wisdome to be found in this kind of study. The maks, and therefore the placing of interfaces rather than entire classful networks, into the routing process allows for cleaner operation. otherwise, it is something of a bother. [snip] BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Ken Diliberto EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[EMAIL PROTECTED] N:Diliberto;Ken END:VCARD Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61325&t=61302 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
