Hi ,
   I have a simple BGP Query , I have got 2 routers : r2 and r5 , which are
connected  to each other via serial link and are on different AS  , there
routing configs are as follows :

for r2 :
interface Loopback0
 ip address 202.202.1.1 255.255.255.255

router ospf 100
 log-adjacency-changes
 network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
!
router bgp 111
 no synchronization
 bgp router-id 202.202.1.1
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 202.202.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
 neighbor 101.101.101.77 remote-as 4799
 neighbor 101.101.101.77 ebgp-multihop 5
 neighbor 101.101.101.77 update-source Loopback0
!


and for R5 :


interface Loopback0
 ip address 101.101.101.77 255.255.255.255
!

router ospf 100
 log-adjacency-changes
 network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
!
router bgp 4799
 no synchronization
 bgp router-id 101.101.101.77
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 101.101.101.77 mask 255.255.255.255
 neighbor 202.202.1.1 remote-as 111
 neighbor 202.202.1.1 ebgp-multihop 5
 neighbor 202.202.1.1 update-source Loopback0
!


when i see there routing tables , this output is as follows :

on R2

   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*  101.101.101.77/32
                    101.101.101.77           0             0 4799 i
*> 202.202.1.1/32   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
r2#
r2#


On r5 it is :

  Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 101.101.101.77/32
                    0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
*> 202.202.1.1/32   202.202.1.1              0             0 111 i
r5#



why is the route of :  *  101.101.101.77/32 not coming as the best path
with > on R2 as in the table of r5 it is displaying the path of *>
202.202.1.1/32  as best path ,

I dont want to do redistribution of BGP in OSPF and plus I dont want to give
any static routes to the peers , as they are getting the path of destination
loopback is known via OSPF , and the routes are there in the routing table .
 Is there any other solution for this solution , by peering with loopbacks .

thanks,

Navin Parwal




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61756&t=61756
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to