Hello,I have R1 connected to R4 running Rip ver. 2R4 connected to R3
running Rip ver 1R4 to R2 and R2 to R3 running Ospf 1 R1R4R2        
120.20.14.0/26
^                                        
^
|                                         
|
|                                         
|
|                                         
|
R3<----------------| Using a 120.20.x.x networks.I cannot see the network
120.20.14.0/26 b/w R4 and R1 on R3.I was expecting to see a 120.0.0.0/8
classful route on R3 via RIP but that's not the caseHow can I see this
route on R3?Config:R4#rbrrouter rip
 version 2
 passive-interface default
 no passive-interface Loopback0
 no passive-interface TokenRing0
 network 4.0.0.0
 network 120.0.0.0
 neighbor 120.20.14.1 no auto-summaryend R4-H#ri to0
interface TokenRing0
 ip address 120.20.34.4 255.255.255.192
 ip rip send version 1
 ip rip receive version 1
 ip summary-address rip 120.20.14.0 255.255.255.0
 ring-speed 16
end
 Routing table on R3#3.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C       3.3.3.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
R    4.0.0.0/8 [120/1] via 120.20.34.4, 00:00:00, TokenRing0
     120.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 13 subnets, 6 masks
C       120.20.36.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1
C       120.20.34.0/26 is directly connected, TokenRing0
C       120.20.23.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
O       120.20.234.4/32 [110/128] via 120.20.234.2, 02:05:21, Serial0.234
O       120.20.234.2/32 [110/64] via 120.20.234.2, 02:05:21, Serial0.234
C       120.20.234.0/27 is directly connected, Serial0.234 Is OSPF
'suppressing' this route as it's AD=110 over Rip, AD=120? Please advise.Thank
you.Sincerely.CN
  

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62116&t=62116
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to