if u do dual redistribution, and u don't watch after the nets redistributed into is-is from being redistributed back to rip then u'll have problems.
""Cisco Nuts"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello, > > Just stumbled upon this on Rip to Isis redistribution? > > "If the source protocol's AD is higher than that of IS-IS, then the > originating routes may be over-ridden by the new IS-IS route leading to > flapping routes and/or incorrect next-hop addresses" > > What does this actually mean? Does it mean the if netw. 4.0.0.0/8 (lo0 > ip=4.4.4.4/24) is being originated by Rip v1 on R1 and passed to R2 > running Rip and IS-IS, then when Rip is redistributed into IS-IS on R2, > R2 applies it's AD of 115 on this route and passes it upstream to other > L-1 and L-2 routers. How would this lead to a flapping route or an > unreachable next-hop address? > > I just cannot seem to find a good example of this on CCO. Does any one > have any suggestions on how to clarify this? > > (This looks like a very likey lab question) !! > > Thank you. > > Sincerely, > > CN > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62329&t=62317 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
