Some question I had as I've been reading Doyle V2. 1) Question about next-hop-self. Suppose the router is purely an iBGP router-- it does not have any eBGP connections and is there is no redist into BGP. Does setting this command on a iBGP neighbor have any affect? If this router is a route-reflector does the behavior change?
2) There's mention that when a cluster uses two route reflectors, that the two reflectors must be configured with the same cluster ID (in order to avoid routing loops). If two route reflectors in a cluster use different cluster IDs, how is it that a routing loop can occur? 3) When configuring two route reflectors for a cluster, is it typical to make each reflector a client of the other? Why or why not? What issues, if any, would arise if the RRs are clients of each other? 4) When a route reflector is used and RR clients configured via a peer group, does the RR compute a single set of routes for reflection and sent to all RR clients? Does this mean a RR might reflect back to a client a route the RR learned from the client? 5) When associating a "no-export" community to an advertisement, is the route-map applied to the network statement or to the neighbor statement? Or can this be done via either mechanism? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62334&t=62334 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
