Hi Rajesh, In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> I come across some situations where I could see some routes in the BGP > table, but those routes aren't there in the regular routing table. The > configuration has "no sync" configured and couldn't guess how to go > about it. Can somebody help me out here? Is this an EBGP or IBGP neighbor? If EBGP, is the prefix being dampened? Is the nexthop for the prefix reachable? Is there a route-map being applied inbound? Is there a prefix-list being applied inbound? Is there a distribute-list being applied inbound? Are you using soft-reconfig? Is this a normal AFI IPv4 prefix? Are you using traditional config or NLRIs? Do the routes not imported have something in common? It would help a lot if you pasted sh ip bgp nei addr, sh ip bgp prefix and sh ip ro nexthop. Everybody uses "no synchronization" nowadays, it's a bugwards compatibility feature that you need to turn specify it in your configuration. // kaj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62527&t=62519 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
