Based on the following text, from "http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/105/policevsshape.html"; Class Based Policing could not guarantee the bandwith specified in the `priority command. Any thoughts?
"In this configuration, the police command sends packets from the child classes based on the size of the packet and the number of bytes remaining in the conform and exceed token buckets. (See Traffic Policing.) The result is that rates given to the Voice over IP (VoIP) and Internet Protocol (IP) classes may not be guaranteed since the police feature is overriding the guarantees made by the priority feature. However, if the shape command is used, the result is a hierarchical queuing system, and all guarantees are made" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62889&t=62889 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
