""Jason Steig"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > it worked!!!!!! thanks!!!!!Jason Steig wrote: > >
forgive me for having gotten lost in this thread....... > > so your saying that my statement > > ip access-list 1 permit ip 192.17.73.0 0.191.251.0 will permit > > all hosts from network 192.17.73.0 and 192.81.73.0?? > > > > 17 is 00010001 > > 81 is 01010001 mask = 01000000 the "1" in the 64 place allows for either "17" or "81" so the proper mask is 0.0.64.255 "255" allows for all values in the last octet I hope that's what you are saying, because that is the correct answer. > > > > so the bit it doesn't match on is the 64 bit. so i just have > > to switch it around if your saying the ones don't count > > > > so it would be 0.191.251.0 ?? > > > > becuase if the zeros must match and ones don't count then that > > would be it then?? > > > > or is is 0.192.252.255 becuase the last octet is 255 so it > > allows all hosts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63677&t=63644 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
