""Metla Venu Gopal"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Its on a real life scenario implementing MPLS
uh oh, real life. gotta be careful, 'cuz I've got very little real life in this realm. :-> > > Dont you thins there will be any kinda of problems when you redistrubute RIP > V2 stuff in BGP and again redistribute the same into RIP. > Doesnt that cause any problem taking into consideration the amount of > routing table and the process and other issues. assuming this is a Cisco environment, the biggest thing I can think of is that BGP has an admon distance of 20 whiole RIP has an admin distance of 120. The very real danger of your RIP routes showing back up as BGP routes with a source elsewhere will cause a very big problem. filtering is essential. idle curiousity, and I am asking because of my lack of real world here, but wouldn't you prefer a better behaved and faster converging protocol than RIP? MPLS depends upon the underlying routing protocol / routing table, doesn't it? > > thanks > venu Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63830&t=63827 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
