I don't think they should have a problem. The VRF should be created just for you so there should be no conflict. I never used this service from any of my providers so I cannot be certain. But as far as I'm concerned they shouldn't even care what addressing you're using between the sites. They provide the tunnel and shouldn't care much for your addressing scheme unless you ask them too, and as long as your contract is properly setup I think it would be no big deal.
""Lo Ching"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dear All, > > We have some ip address that use internally,eg, 30.x or 40.x but it is not > in private address range. Can I still use this range when connect to the > IP-VPN provider that using MPLS technology? I know that MPLS can allow > overlapping of customer address by using VRF and RD. I wonder any technical > conflict issue on Normal BGP in this case. > > Thanks in advance. > > rgds, > Lo Ching Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64041&t=64036 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
