Hello, I'm trying to setup the most simple configuration, in order to show
how QoS works on a 827H.

This is what I do:

access-list 120 permit ip host 192.168.0.13 any
access-list 130 permit ip host 192.168.0.7 any

class-map one
 match access-group 120
class-map two
 match access-group 130

policy-map test
 class one
  bandwidth 8
 class two
  bandwidth 16

int e0
 service-policy output test         // only way to apply this policy

Router#sh pol
  Policy Map test
    Class one
      Weighted Fair Queueing
            Bandwidth 8 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
    Class two
      Weighted Fair Queueing
            Bandwidth 16 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)

Router#sh pol int
 Ethernet0
  Service-policy output: test
    Class-map: one (match-all)
      0 packets, 0 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: access-group 120
      Weighted Fair Queueing
        Output Queue: Conversation 265
        Bandwidth 8 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
        (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
        (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0

    Class-map: two (match-all)
      0 packets, 0 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: access-group 130
      Weighted Fair Queueing
        Output Queue: Conversation 266
        Bandwidth 16 (kbps) Max Threshold 64 (packets)
        (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
        (depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0

    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      10265 packets, 1107280 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 4000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any

What's the problem?
I would expect to see a different download rate from 192.168.0.13
than 192.168.0.7
But, both of them have the same download rate.
I would highly appreciate any suggestion.

Thanks to all of you. Regards.






Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64466&t=64466
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to