I guess this would depend on the media / interface that you are applying the ACL to? EG for TR, you would use non-canonical, and if applying the address to ethernet interface canonical.
Presumably, inbound packets from TR pass "through" any inbound ACL's, then get converted to canonical and passed out ethernet interface (or DLSW etc?? )( [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Today I read two opposite posts about the MAC address format on > MAC > access-list. > > The article on 'http://www.netmasterclass.net/site/lib.php' > (article > Filtering DLSW) says that one should use non canonical format. > > The link > 'http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_r/brprt1/br1dtb.htm#1017750' > > says the opposite, one should use canonical (Ethernet) > format. > > Any Thoughts? > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64885&t=64754 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
