My understanding of the situation (being the guy Larry Sanger replied  
to in that thread) is that while we focusing on being a reliable  
source, we're not a primary source, and we're not even really always  
a secondary source.  We're not presenting research (assuming WP:NOR  
stands), and often times the sources WP cites are themselves  
secondary.  Even assuming we're going to get an approved article down  
to the best citations possible, a student still should aim for using  
those primary sources in any form of serious research paper.  Now,  
that's going to vary by institute and class level.  That's a must for  
a 300-level or 400-level class, but maybe not for a 101 class, and  
I'm sure it's stricter here or at another top 25 school than it is at  
your average college or university.  For a research paper or a book,  
CZ isn't going to be the source you want, regardless of reliability.

So there's not a question that CZ will never be the best source for a  
serious academic discussion (but it may be a good starting point, and  
hopefully will be).  It's a Citizen's Compendium, not an Acadendium  
(Academic's Compendium).  I feel that the best purpose for CZ is to  
share this academics' knowledge with the rest of the world.  That's  
why we should be writing to the level of a high-school educated (or  
first-year college) person.  A person who wants to learn more about a  
subject in a way that's free and easy can do so.  That's the service  
we provide to the world, not a great thing to cite in a paper.

Zachary Pruckowski

On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Jon Awbrey wrote:

> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> Re: http://textop.org/smf/index.php?board=14;topic=138.3#msg1234
>
> Larry & All,
>
> I would like to quote in full the following "rubric" that Larry  
> posted in the Forum:
>
> Larry Sanger wrote:
>>
>> I think we should make a prominent Note to Students:
>>
>> Citing any encyclopedia is a very bad idea in serious academic  
>> scholarship,
>> not because encyclopedias are unreliable, but because they are not  
>> original
>> sources.  They are derivative.  Use the Citizendium to do  
>> background research,
>> but then go to the original sources--books and articles--that we  
>> cite, when you
>> are looking for supporting sources for papers.
>>
>> The only acceptable exception, in responsible scholarship, occurs  
>> when you
>> specifically need to have the "conventional wisdom" about a point,  
>> in the
>> same way that occasionally one quotes a dictionary definition to  
>> make some
>> point.  In such instances, your point should be about what the  
>> conventional
>> wisdom, or the conventional definition, is--in other words, not to  
>> establish
>> some fact actually cited, but to establish that, conventionally, a  
>> point is
>> understood a certain way.
>>
>> « Last Edit: Today at 01:43:52 PM by Larry Sanger »
>
> For me this statement brings up a question that has been much on my  
> mind:
> What is the difference, if any, between a Compendium and an  
> Encyclopedia,
> and are all encyclopedias really the same as those books that we  
> left at
> home when we left for college?
>
> I already know the answer to the second half of the question, as I  
> have
> many "encyclopedias" on my shelves that are solid works of reference,
> and I know that, historically speaking, not all "encyclopedias" have
> been intended for children.
>
> But what I have not got a clear sense of from reading
> Larry's position papers on Citizendium is just how he
> intends the difference, if any.
>
> So I think some clarification on that point is due.
>
> Jon Awbrry
>
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
> inquiry e-lab: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
> citizendium development forums: http://smf.citizendium.org
> http://www.textop.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Jon_Awbrey
> wikinfo: http://wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=User:Jon_Awbrey
> wp review: http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showuser=398
> o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
>
> _______________________________________________
> Citizendium-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l


_______________________________________________
Citizendium-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l

Reply via email to