I am not sure myself whether I mean this seriously, but, like a doctoral candidate, perhaps an article can have an ad hoc committee.
On 10/25/06,
David Filippi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 25, 2006, at 3:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:From: Susan Awbrey < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>Dear All,
Instead of an authoritarian name like caesar or czar why not have a name that (I thought, hope) reflects the nature of Citizendium. What about calling its users citizens?I like this. I've also wondered about the term "editors" as used in CZ. Since "editing" is what changing a wikipedia article is called, and since any "citizen" can do this, why not eliminate confusion by using a different word for people who are tasked to approve articles? My incredibly creative and original suggestion is to call them "approvers."-David
_______________________________________________
Citizendium-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
_______________________________________________ Citizendium-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
