All, I have always found editor-oriented tags on Wikipedia articles annoying, such as the "cleanup" tag and the "disputed neutrality" tag. They don't help the reader much, I think; they clutter the page and most of what they can be said is said with a catch-all disclaimer at the top of all unapproved CZ articles:
The article below may contain errors of fact, bias, grammar, etc. The Citizendium Foundation and the participants in the Citizendium project make no representations about the reliability of this article or, generally, its suitability for any purpose. We make this disclaimer of all Citizendium article versions that have not been specifically approved. These templates are used inconsistently, and, more to the point, it seems impossible to use them consistently. If they should be anywhere, they should be on the talk pages. I think that, with editors and a content dispute resolution process (under construction), we ought to be able to get rid of all such tags, or maybe move them to the talk pages, although I'd prefer to just get rid of them. I mean many, but probably not all, of these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages But I could be convinced otherwise. What do you think? --Larry _______________________________________________ Citizendium-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
