Re: [Citizendium-l] Update

Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:10:25 -0800

I do not agree with “Me” [=quentinmaurus].  The overall head of a project must engage in many delicate negotiations with the goal of supporting the project and needs a confidential working group to help with that.  A little thought will reveal the advantages of that, and the disadvantages to the mission of the project of open Executive Committee meetings.   To speak of an Executive Committee as “anointed” does not seem appropriate.

 

Anthony.Sebastian

 

_________________________
Anthony Sebastian, MD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [preferred email address] 
 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Me
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Citizendium-l] Update

 

> Both of these groups are by invitation only.  The Executive Committee, since

> it deals with sensitive issues of many sorts, will be closed-archive.  The

> editor group will be open archive:



This is of concern to me, I have been following this project on the lists and forums 


from it's beginning and one of the battle cries has been "Maximum Transparency!"



Now you have a special anointed group holding closed door discussions.



Am I the only one seeing the conflict between stated mission and implementation?




Quentin









_______________________________________________
Citizendium-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l

Reply via email to