> If there are some remarks, please let me know. I've only access to
> a teTeX distribution on Debian GNU/Linux.
Sorry, I'm away from good internet access for the next three weeks.
> I currently need four hlatex2agl.pl commands, one for each .sfd
> file: UKS-HLaTeX.sfd, UKS-HLaTeX-Hangul.sfd,
> UKS-HLaTeX-Hangul_Hanja.sfd and UKS-HLaTeX-Hangul_Symbol.sfd. So it
> would be nice if hlatex2agl.pl could also have an extra argument to
> choose which .sfd is to be used.
Patch, please :-)
> The u??.pfb files created by hlatex2agl have exactly the same name
> as the original HLaTeX counterparts. Do I have to overwrite the
> original fonts?
Yes. They are improved versions with corrected glyph names; nothing
else has changed.
> I have problems with dinaru and pilgia when I run dvips or pdflatex.
> Well, warnings actually. With dvips I get:
>
> dvips: Checksum mismatch in udn10
> [...]
This is not related to the PFB fonts but to TFM (and VF) files. PFBs
don't contain a checksum at all. Apparently the DVI file you are
using for testing purposes has been created with a different set of
metric files (probably the old ones, whatever they are; maybe you have
still something from earlier experiments).
> I noticed that hlatex2agl didn't put a comment in the dinaru and
> pilgia .pfb fonts. I think the reason is that these two fonts were
> the only two not created by Fontographer 4.1 but by FontForge 1.0.
> Perhaps hlatex2agl botches something up?
The FontForge version used to create those PFBs doesn't add a
`Generated' comment line which hlatex2agl uses as an anchor to insert
its additional comment. Perhaps it would be useful to apply the
following patch.
--- hlatex2agl.pl 2006-04-25 17:11:50.000000000 +0200
+++ hlatex2agl.pl.new 2006-08-09 10:31:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -455,7 +455,7 @@
print(OUTFILE $_);
# Add comment.
- if (/^% Generated/) {
+ if (/^% CreationDate/) {
print(OUTFILE "% AGL compliant glyph names added "
. "by script $prog 2005-Jul-27.\n");
}
A similar problem occurs with udn00.pfb: The very first line doesn't
contain `001.000', so the script is not able to correctly update the
version number. You might extend the regular expression to handle
this; I'm too lazy for it.
> I get the following warnings:
>
> gothic/log:Use of uninitialized value in hash element at
> hlatex2agl.pl line 359.
> [...]
Interesting. Please tell me which fonts are involved. I suspect this
is due to problems with Koaung-Hi's VF files.
> Currently each font is its own "italics" and its own "typewriter"
> font. Only the glue would be different. Would you prefer to have
> for example every \texttt{} use Tada, or should the user himself be
> smart enough to use \CJKfamily{tt} and to reconfigure \texttt and \tt
> if s/he wishes so? We might have to rethink how the .fd files are
> configured.
*This* you should discuss with Koaung-Hi :-) I have no idea how Korean
fonts are used in the real world.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Cjk maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk
