> > I could imagine that \ruby{document}{text} should be output as
> > `text (document)' or something.
>
> Rather "document (text)" with "document" as ruby base and "text" as
> ruby text?
Yes, of course.
> \newcommand*{\ruby}[2]{#1 (#2)}
Sorry for being unclear: It should appear as normal ruby in the pdf:
ruby
base character
but if cut and pasted, it should become
base character (ruby)
> \BeginAccSupp{method=pdfstringdef,ActualText={ (#2)},}%
Aah, this works! Here's a preliminary patch to ruby.sty which
provides the `base character (ruby)' style for the dvipdfmx driver.
Replace `dvipdfm' with `pdftex' if necessary -- remember, however,
that pdftex doesn't provide proper ToUnicode support for virtual fonts
(which are used for the Japanese wadalab and Korean fonts in TeXLive,
for example).
Thanks a lot, Heiko!
Werner
======================================================================
--- /home/wl/git/cjk/texinput/ruby.sty 2008-05-22 00:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ ruby.sty 2008-06-13 07:31:50.000000000 +0200
@@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
\RequirePackage{CJK}[1996/11/20]
+\RequirePackage[dvipdfm, unicode]{hyperref}
+\RequirePackage[dvipdfm]{accsupp}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
@@ -147,7 +149,11 @@
\fi
\fi
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ \BeginAccSupp{method=pdfstringdef,
+ unicode,
+ ActualText={#1 (#2)}}
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ \EndAccSupp{}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > \z@
_______________________________________________
Cjk maillist - [email protected]
https://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk
