On 2010-3-22 2:23, Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) wrote:
> Hi Jinsong, Werner
>
> I don't have the answer either; but I am able to reproduce the error.
Thank you very much for your attention.
There is another problem about CJKnumb package. \CJKnumber{100000008}
would be read as \...@one\cjk@hundredmillion\...@zero\cjk@zero\...@eight
by CJKnumb package. In fact, it should be read as
\...@one\cjk@hundredmillion\...@zero\cjk@eight, i.e., two zeroes should
be suppressed to one zero.
Regards,
Jinsong
> I did come across another error: hundred million and ten thousand
> don't have the correct Unicode referencesn in CJKnumb.sty.
>
> @Werner: here is my patch.
>
> diff -Nbaurw CJKnumb.sty.orig CJKnumb.sty
> --- CJKnumb.sty.orig 2009-01-05 17:01:05.000000000 +0100
> +++ CJKnumb.sty 2010-03-21 19:21:24.377304834 +0100
> @@ -166,8 +166,8 @@
> \def\...@ten{\unicode{83}{65}}
> \def\...@hundred{\unicode{118}{126}}
> \def\...@thousand{\unicode{83}{67}}
> - \def\...@tenthousand{\unicode{132}{44}}
> - \def\...@hundredmillion{\unicode{81}{4}}
> + \def\...@tenthousand{\unicode{78}{7}}
> + \def\...@hundredmillion{\unicode{78}{191}}
>
> \def\...@minus{\unicode{255}{13}}}
>
>
> BR
>
_______________________________________________
Cjk maillist - Cjk@ffii.org
https://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/cjk
