Dear Cindy:

The following is a cut and paste of a response I have made before on this
topic:  (There is a reference to a Dr. Jory Olsen in the following text.
He is an Internal Medicine Veterinarian who was once on our list a couple
of years ago.  He had/has a special interest in this disorder and in
cavaliers.)

As to a discussion on Thrombocytopenia; I think it is helpful to first note
the definition of this term.  Thrombocytopenia literally translates to "a
decreased number of thrombocytes".  Thrombocytes are a type of blood cell
that is essential in forming a blood clot.  Another name for thrombocyte is
a "platelet".  If the number of platelets become "extremely low", bleeding
disorders can become evident because the low number of platelets cannot
perform their blood clotting function.  Platelet numbers and function can
be interfered with by diseases or substances such as bone marrow failure
immune-mediated disorders (e.g. autoimmune hemolytic anemia), toxins,
drugs, cancers, comsumptive coagulopathies (e.g. rat poisons), and
infectious agents, such as bacterial organisms.  (I can't help but think of
modified live vaccines here).  The "normal" range of platelets is about
200-500.  So, when one has " Thrombocytopenia" is means they have decreased
platelets (below normal range).  Thrombocytopenia can either be
"asymptomatic" (showing no clinical symptoms of disease) or "symptomatic"
(display clinical characteristics of a disease).  Thrombocytopenia can be
"idiopathic" (arising spontaneously or from an obscure or unknown primary
cause).

The Swedish study (P. Eksell, J. Haggstom, C. Kvart & A. Karlsson) studied
blood samples of 102 cavaliers.  Out of the 102 cavaliers, 32 had a
platelet count less than 100 (150-400 was normal range for their lab used)
and 4 of those 32 were less than 50.  This study finalizes by saying that
the clinical significance and pathogenesis (origination and development of
a disease) of Thrombocytopenia in the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel is not
yet understood.

The Canadian study (L.E. Smedile, D.M. Houston, S.M. Taylor, K. Post, G.P.
Searcy) was based on the study of 11 "case studies" and its intention was
to only study the clinicopathological features of Cavaliers with
"Idiopathic, Asymptomatic Thrombocytopenia".  These cases were from medical
records from 29 North American Veterinary colleges between the years
1983-1993 and all were presented for a variety of clinical problems AND had
Idiopathic Asymptomatic Thrombocytopenia..  Final conclusion - no temporal
(of or relating to the sequence of time or to a particular time)
correlation between vaccination and thrombocytopenia was established; no
correlation between mitral valve endocardiosis and Thrombocytopenia has
been established; etiology (cause/origin) of Thrombocytopenia identified in
CKCSs is unknown. Thrombocytopenia can be congenital; result from platelet
sequestration (setting apart/isolate); increased platelet consumption;
decreased platelet production; or increased destruction.  In evaluating the
11 cases, several of these possibilities were deemed unlikely for various
reasonings, but platelet destruction was commented on.  Platelet
destruction due to ITP (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenia Purpura(?) (hemorrhagic
state characterized by patches of purplish discoloration resulting from
escaped blood into the skin and mucous membranes - petechia) is a common
cause of Thrombocytopenia in dogs; however, definitive diagnosis of ITP is
difficult and frequently is made by exclusion of other conditions.  The
article discusses methods of diagnosing what the clinical forms of
Thrombocytopenia were and their responses to therapy.  The article states:
"The asymptomatic nature of the Thrombocytopenia in the CKCS in this report
suggests adequate platelet function.  Clinical evidence of hemorrhage
commonly does not occur until the platelet count is less than
50x10(9)/L(6).  Perhaps the larger-than-normal platelets in the dogs with
platelet numbers less than 50x10(9)/L had increased functional capacity;
platelet function has been speculated to depend more on total platelet mass
(i.e., platelet number x platelet volume) than on actual platelet number.
Final conclusion:  recognition of Idiopathic, Asymptomatic Thrombocytopenia
in the CKCS is important; previous reports indicate incidences as high as
31%; further studies into platelet structure, function and life span and
megakaryocyte (found in bone marrow and is considered to be the source of
blood platelets) structure, should help to define the underlying
pathophysiology of Idiopathic Asympotomatic Thrombocytopenia.

All that said, there is no clear understanding of Thrombocytopenia, further
study is considered important for the breed and recommended.  Because of
the uncertainties with this disorder, and the fact that such a diverse
range of possibilities can bring about this disorder, i.e. drugs, immune
system (over  active or under active) responses and anecdotal experiences
are varied, it seems only logical to me that we excercise caution in our
treatments (of any sort) and that we concentrate of figuring out how to
support weak areas.  If you think about it, vaccines introduce various
forms of bacterial or viral matter into the body with the intent of
stimulating an immune system response.  The job of the immune system is to
fight off infections and reject foreign proteins.  The components of the
immune system (white blood cells, antibodies and other substances) are
designed to act as a "police force" patrolling the body and is designed to
recognize "self cells" from "non-self cells".  It is this ability that
causes the body to reject skin grafts, blood transfusions and organ
transplants.  The immune system can fail; either by not doing its job or by
doing it too well and no one knows "why" the immune system fails or short
circuits.  The experts can only speculate.  One such speculation is the use
of multivalent modifed-live vaccines overstimulating the immune system.  As
I recited in my previous post, Dr. Virginia Luis Fuentes discusses such
speculation as says that some investigators believe it is a harmless
anomaly seen in CKCS, whereas other investigators believe it is a
significant problem and many CKCS live on a knife-edge and may develop a
clinically-apparent bleeding disorder at any time. She reinforces the fact
that more work is needed to study large numbers of cavaliers over a period
of time.

Dr. Jean Dodds is a specialist I would refer you to for further information
and treatment.  Dr. Jean Dodds (for those who don't know who she is) is an
internationally recognized authority in veterinary hematology (a branch of
biology that deals with the blood and blood-forming organs) and immunology
(a science that deals with the phenomena and cases of immunity and immune
responses).

In a preface to Dr. Dodds' Revised Vaccination Protocol, 1997, she writes:

"This schedule is the one I recommend and should NOT be interpreted to mean
that other protocols recommended by a veterinarian would be less
satisfactory.  It's a matter of professional judgement and choice.

For breeds or families of dogs susceptible to or affected with immune
dysfunction, immune-mediated disease, immune-reactions associated with
vaccinations, or autoimmune endocrine disease (e.g. thyroiditis, Addison's
or Cushing's disease, diabetes, etc.), the following protocol is recommended."

She goes on to relay her recommendations for vaccine type/age of pup; info
on what she recommends for boosters and what she does, and does not,
vaccinate for and why.  She does NOT recommend vaccinating bitches during
estrus (in season), pregnancy, or lactation (nursing mothers).

She concludes with:

"For animals previously experiencing adverse vaccine reactions or breeds at
higher risk for such reactions (e.g. Weimaraners, Akitas), alternatives to
booster vaccinations should be considered.  These include avoiding boosters
except rabies vaccine as required by law; annually measuring serum antibody
titers against specific canine infectious agents, such as distemper and
parvovirus; and homeopathic nosodes. (This last option is considered an
unconventional treatment that has not been scientifically proven to be
efficacious.  However, data from Europe and clinical experience in North
America support its use, and controlled studies are underway to test the
method under challenge conditions.  If veterinarians choose to use
homeopathic nosodes, their clients should be provided with an appropriate
disclaimer and written informed consent should be obtained.)"

My summary of the above info is such that I believe Dr. Dodds does still
recommend careful practices in vaccinating; does not say don't vaccinate
puppies or adults, although animals with adverse reactions, or breeds with
greater risks for reactions, should consider alternatives to booster
vaccinations, including avoiding boosters (except rabies) and instead to
annually measure serum antibody titers against specific diseases and/or use
homeopathic nosodes (not scientifically proven, but clinical experience
supports its use).

One only need to ask themselves - why did Dr. Dodds feel the need to come
up with a new recommended vaccination protocol (bear in mind her field of
expertise)?  Attention is drawn to immune system responses to vaccines
given.  I also note the "legal" cautions.

Dr. Jory Olsen's post provides (IMO) some sound advice for those who aren't
sure what we should, or should not, be doing and bears repeating.  It also
appears to line up with what Dr. Dodds writes.  I might add that these are
also my practices.  Dr. Jory Olsen wrote:

"No one has any proof of association between vaccination and
thrombocytopenia so don't hold your breath. It will be difficult to prove.
I would not necessarily expect a dog to have normal counts and then be
vaccinated and drop. The effects may be slow onset and chronic and low
counts may be present before vaccination and be unchanged after vaccination
but still be due to vaccination some time ago. It will be difficult to sort
out. The safest thing to do is reduce vaccination since we have growing
evidence that yearly vaccines are not necessary. The original one year
interval is not based on any studies either. Ask to see some proof that
your dog needs a yearly vaccine some time and see what you get. If the
vaccines do not turn out to be a factor, you have not caused any harm by
reducing to a more appropriate vaccination interval. There is a study by an
immunologist that shows protection form puppyhood vaccination that last for
7 years of a study and 10 years total so far in the after study follow up.
Titers vastly underestimate the duration of immunity and 97-98% of dogs
remain with protective titers for distemper at 3 years and 95% have
protective titers for Parvo at 3 years. We will not cause rampant disease
by reducing the frequency of vaccination. I will never advocate no
vaccinations (although some do) because I think they are an important part
or protection of our pets as well as ourselves(Rabies)."

A CBC (complete blood count) will tell you whether you currently have a dog
with Thrombocytopenia.  We shouldn't let all of this knowledge cripple us,
we should respect it for what it is and act accordingly.

Pat Barrington - Barrington Cavaliers (Southern Ontario-Canada)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to