On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 05:27:10AM -0400, Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
> Herbert,
> 
> Do you have a brief list of things that are changing in 2.6.9-rc2 vs 2.6.8.1
> that might change CKRM? Is it the replacement of dnotify with inotify? Are
> there deeper changes with the scheduler, cfq io scheduler, and vmscan.c?

I had to adapt linux-vserver to changes in

 - memory accounting vma_pages()
 - some pid/tgid handling
 - scheduler stats 
 
haven't checked io scheduler because this
isn't currently addressed by linux-vserver

HTH,
Herbert

> Marc
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Herbert
> Poetzl
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 5:29 PM
> To: Marc E. Fiuczynski
> Cc: Shailabh Nagar; ckrm-Tech
> Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] general performance of CKRM
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 03:03:01PM -0400, Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
> > Is e16 for 2.6.7 only?  What's involved to make it work on 2.6.8.1?
> 
> would be a good idea to look at 2.6.9-rc2 too, because
> several things where changed there ...
> 
> best,
> Herbert
> 
> > CKRM is the only thing that has kept us from upgrading to that kernel
> > release.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shailabh Nagar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:44 PM
> > To: Marc E. Fiuczynski
> > Cc: ckrm-Tech
> > Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] general performance of CKRM
> >
> >
> > Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
> >
> > >>Will put measurements on stack ...
> > >
> > >
> > > We plan to run QA tests on a daily basis. If you have some simply
> > > measurements or other sanity tests that you'd like me to fold into our
> > > environment (based on dejagnu), please send those to me.
> >
> > Will do. There are two sets of tests we have : one set has a few "stress"
> > tests and is included in the ckrm/tests directory of ckrm-E13-pkg
> > (available from the main website). The other is a set of tests that
> > checks basic functionality. I'll send those out to you and include in
> > the e16 pkg.
> >
> >
> > >>... need to get e16 out first.
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you have an ETA? Can you summarize in what ways it will differ from
> > E15?
> >
> > Mainly bug fixes. We'll also try and put in a slightly expanded share
> > interface which allows the default class' shares to be explicitly
> > specified.
> >
> > ETA is Monday(Sep 20) - I'll put an rc version out earlier for people to
> > bang on.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Shailabh
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > ckrm-tech mailing list
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
> Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to