Marc E. Fiuczynski wrote:
With the new controllers in CKRM in place, has anyone looked at whether these controllers are sufficient to isolate "anti-social" behavior (e.g., fork bombs, i/o bombs, etc.)? In other words, assuming these anti-social processes were placed into an appropriate class, do the other classes obtain their share of the system resources? I ask as this is an important piece that we wish to get right for PlanetLab.
Marc
Marc, if you have test setups which mimic the kind of anti-social behaviour you expect or have seen on PlanetLab, that'd be handy.
Shailabh
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
