Hi Shailabh,

Took a look at your documentation on using the I/O controller.  I can see
how one might use the I/O controller if one had a few classes. E.g., the
gold, silver, and bronze class of I/O based processes (or maybe up to ~20
classes). However, in my environment I may potentially have hundreds of
vservers. What I was hoping for was a means to isolate one vserver's I/O
bandwidth consumption from that of other vserver. I.e., something more like
a proportional share of the I/O bandwidth. For this reason, I was expecting
that I could create a one-to-one mapping between each vserver and a new
class and give each vserver a share. It is not obvious to me how I would do
that using your scheme.

Of course, it is entirely possible that I simply misunderstood the way one
can use the I/O controller. In what way do you suggest I assign I/O shares
to each of these vservers?

Best regards,
Marc


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shailabh
Nagar
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:00 PM
To: Marc Fiuczynski
Cc: ckrm-tech
Subject: [ckrm-tech] I/O controller for e16


Here is another attempt to get the I/O controller working for e16.

On my P4 SMT box, I'm able to run tiobench's in different classes
though I don't observe a significant differentiation between the
priority levels. OTOH, the depth of the I/O request queues formed by
tiobench is pretty small so that needs to be eliminated as a cause by
using an aio-based test.

Please give it a spin. There's rudimentary documentation included in
the patch.

Marc, I'm getting onto the differentiation resolution now. Let me know
  if this controller creates problems like last time...


Regards,
Shailabh





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to