On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 10:53, Hubertus Franke wrote:
<snip>
> Right now we are aiming for kernel inclusion.
>
> At large, the schedulers are independent but there are naturally
> some dependencies. E.g. no matter how much cpu shares
> I give to a class, if it doesn't have enough memory, it will be
> hampered by page fault.
>
> Optimizing these interactions and making memory a dependency
> for cpu shares would be something useful.
</snip>
This is an interesting point -- as CKRM begins to manage more abstract
resources I imagine these implicit dependencies between resources will
emerge and have an increasing impact on the resulting performance.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
