Hubertus Franke wrote:
Here are the results of a simple "performance experiment".

I performed a series of kernel compiles "make -j3 bzImage"
on my labtop for different configurations against 2.6.8.1.
Times are reported "total (sys)" in seconds.
"*" indicates after reboot.


vanilla CKRM-E16 + cpu-v8 CKRM-E16+cpu-v8+numtasks 336.75(32.01)* 337.92(31.96)* 332.29(31.87) 332.64(31.56) 332.71(31.48) 332.68(31.60) 332.99(31.53) 333.18(31.86) 332.44(31.83 332.53(31.56) 332.72(31.79) 332.81(31.65)

In the CKRM case, no only the CPU controller was compiled into
the kernel (as required). numtasks was dynamically loaded.
No other controllers were enabled.

Based on these result, I don't see in this workload any overhead for CKRM, the cpu scheduler or the numtasks controller.

The memory controller is next to test in this series.
But I simply wanted to get a few potential culprits off the
most-wanted list.

-- Hubertus

On my 1.8 GHz P4, 512KB mem machine, I'm able to successfully compile a 2.6.8.1 kernel with make -j4 with each controller added successively.

The times are given below.

To isolate the problem that Mark is seeing (I'm seeing a panic using his tree too), I'll try disabling the controllers in his tree one by one.

-- Shailabh



linux-2.6.8.1
-------------
stable, responsive

+ ckrm-e16 (CKRM disabled in config)
------------------------------------
stable, responsive

+ ckrm-e16 (numtasks, listenaq configured, NOT loaded)
------------------------------------------------------
stable, responsive

+ ckrm-e16 (numtasks, listenaq configured, loaded)
----------------------------------------------------

real 10m37.386s
user  9m42.486s
sys   0m51.418s

+ ckrm-e16 + cpu-v7 (loaded)
----------------------------

real 10m36.842s
user  9m42.162s
sys   0m51.232s

+ ckrm-e16 + cpu-v7 (loaded) + mem-v2 (loaded)
-----------------------------------------------

real 10m46.066s
user  9m46.602s
sys   0m55.579s          ---> somewhat of a jump here

+ ckrm-e16 + cpu-v7 (loaded) + mem-v2 (loaded) + io-v4 (loaded)
---------------------------------------------------------------

real 10m41.296s
user  9m43.554s
sys   0m54.936s



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to