On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Shailabh Nagar wrote: > mehta kiran wrote: > There's no way to avoid spending some time on this. We will not be > able to devote any time to providing a Redhat port currently.
Code forks like that are a very time consuming and often wasteful of engineering resources. > > 3. Is Redhat planning to add CKRM in near future. > > If yes , when ? > > Thats a question we'd like to know too :-) It would be good to have CKRM in the upstream kernel before it gets enabled in Fedora. That way there won't be yet another fork of the code base for the developers to maintain, and the code will be compatible with what's in kernel.org's kernel. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
