On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 19:28 -0800, Gerrit Huizenga wrote: > In the pid virtualization, I would think that tasks can move between > containers as well,
I don't think tasks can not be permitted to move between containers. As a simple exercise, imagine that you have two processes with the same pid, one in container A and one in container B. You wish to have them both run in container A. They can't both have the same pid. What do you do? I've been talking a lot lately about how important filesystem isolation between containers is to implement containers properly. Isolating the filesystem namespaces makes it much easier to do things like fs-based shared memory during a checkpoint/resume. If we want to allow tasks to move around, we'll have to throw out this entire concept. That means that a _lot_ of things get a notch closer to the too-costly-to-implement category. -- Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
