On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:09:22 +0530 Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > + /* FALL THROUGH */ > > + case CPU_UP_PREPARE: > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > This should be done at CPU_ONLINE time (since the new CPU won't > be in the cpu_online_map yet)? > --- kernel/ckrm/ckrm_cpu.c.org 2006-01-31 11:37:46.000000000 +0530 > +++ kernel/ckrm/ckrm_cpu.c 2006-01-31 11:39:30.000000000 +0530 > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static int __devinit ckrm_cpu_notify(str > } > ckrm_unlock_hier(cls); > /* FALL THROUGH */ > - case CPU_UP_PREPARE: > + case CPU_ONLINE: > grcd.cpus = cpu_online_map; > grcd.numcpus = cpus_weight(cpu_online_map); > break; Your fix seems correct. I'll apply your patch, thanks for the fix! -- KUROSAWA, Takahiro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
