On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:08:52 +0530 Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not a forward port of the existing CPU resource controller > > but a new CPU resource controller for CKRM. Its resource control > > mechanism is different from that of the existing one. > > Hmm ..I guess it depends on which version of CKRM you are referring when > you say "existing". When I replied earlier, I was referring to f-series. > f-series cpu controller is based on the patch you sent to lkml right? Ah, I referred to the CKRM e- series controller as "existing controller" and referred to the controller that I had sent as "a new CPU resource controller." So, the controller that I had sent is the existing controller of f- series. Sorry for confusion, -- KUROSAWA, Takahiro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
