Hi, > In my case, I have a single CPU machine. Is there any tests already, to test > CPU resource controller and feel the difference of using CKRM ? or to > demonstrate CKRM ? > Any suggestions ?
I've uploaded the follwing two test results to demonstrate the CPU resource controller for f-series CKRM. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ckrm/cpurc-v0.3-2615-kernbench.pdf?download http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ckrm/cpurc-v0.3-2615-lat_ctx.pdf?download The former demonstrates that the share is roughly proportional to the CPU usage of kernbench. The latter demonstrates that the CPU controller's overhead is very small by comparing the scheduling overhead of vannila 2.6.15 to 2.6.15 with CPU controller using lat_ctx. I've done these tests manually, but if you want, you can reproduce the results. Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
