Jean-Pierre Dion wrote:
> Hi Maeda, > > thank you for the information. > > we here at Bull have been working on the memory controller > for some monthes for its various versions. > > We are aware of Andrew's concerns about it and we are > in touch with Chandra to try find a design that could > fit a less intrusive approach, with an easier > maintenance. > > We will discuss here to define an implementation When I say here, I mean this list... ;-) jean-pierre > > that can be accepted in mainline and that gives > the required memory regulation fonctionnalities. > > > jean-pierre > > > MAEDA Naoaki wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Recently, Andrew Moron came Japan to address the status and direction >> of kernel development on OSDL-Japan Linux Symposium. His presentation >> material is available at the following URL. >> >> http://www.osdl.jp/docs/Seminar0613/AndrewMorton_Status_and_Direction_of_Kernel_Development.pdf >> >> >> >> # Don't worry, written in English :-) >> >> He said that the current CKRM core is well-implemented and is acceptable >> for a merge, and CPU controller needs work, but will be OK. >> >> However, he also said that unless the design of CKRM memory controller >> is sorted out, CKRM is blocked. >> >> Thanks, >> MAEDA Naoaki >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ckrm-tech mailing list >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech >> >> >> > -- Jean-Pierre DION Linux and Gnome projects manager Bull, Architect of an Open World TM Tel : +33 (0)4 76 29 72 34 http://www.bull.com http://www.bullopensource.org http://gnome.bullfreeware.com/new_index.html _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
