On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote:
>
> > Absolutely. Since these containers are not (hard) partitioning the
> > memory in any way so it is easy to change the limits (effectively
> > reducing and increasing the memory limits for tasks belonging to
> > containers). As you said, memory hot-un-plug is important and it is
> > non-trivial amount of work.
>
> Maybe the hotplug guys want to contribute to the discussion?
>
Ah, I'm reading threads with interest.
I think this discussion is about using fake nodes ('struct pgdat')
to divide system's memory into some chunks. Your thought is that
for resizing/adding/removing fake pgdat, memory-hot-plug codes may be useful.
correct ?
Now, memory-hotplug manages all memory by 'section' and allows adding/(removing)
section to pgdat.
Does this section-size handling meet container people's requirement ?
And do we need freeing page when pgdat is removed ?
I think at least SPARSEMEM is useful for fake nodes because 'struct page'
are not tied to pgdat. (DISCONTIGMEM uses node_start_pfn. SPARSEMEM not.)
-Kame
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
