On 11/1/06, Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Menage wrote: > > > The framework should be flexible enough to let controllers register > > any control parameters (via the filesystem?) that they need, but it > > shouldn't contain explicit concepts like guarantees and limits. > > If the framework was able to handle arbitrary control parameters, that > would certainly be interesting. > > Presumably there would be some way for the controllers to be called from > the framework to validate those parameters?
The approach that I had in mind was that each controller could register what ever control files it wanted, which would appear in the filesystem directories for each container; reads and writes on those files would invoke handlers in the controller. The framework wouldn't care about the semantics of those control files. See the containers patch that I posted last month for some examples of this. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
