On 2/22/07, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Now it is at least worth investigating if you can leak things if you don't > enter the pid namespace. If you can not leak things that potentially > simplifies big chunks of the problem, and we probably don't need the > intermediate pid namespace, of your suggestion.
If you're happy to have your partially-entered process be viewing the system pid namespace rather than (container pid namespace) + (self) then yes, you don't need the intermediate namespace. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
