Shane wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 16:43 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
>> Please let me know if so see any problem running the patch. The
>> patches are against 2.6.20 only since dependent patches are at that level.
>
> My problem - a bad copy of the patch. It patches o.k.
> However, it fails to compile vmscan. This looks a bit dodgy;
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> @@ -1470,11 +1494,13 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned
> int pass;
> struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
> struct scan_control sc = {
> - .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> + .gfp_mask = GFdefined(CONFIG_CONTAINER_PAGECACHE_ACCT)
> +P_KERNEL,
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> I deleted what looks like an over-enthusiastic "copy-and-paste", and it
> compiled o.k.
> Testing continues.
OOPS!! How did it get there! That is certainly some random mouse
click. Thanks for pointing that out.
--Vaidy
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
