On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:25:35PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > - Walk the task table and find relevant members
>
> That doesn't seem like a terrible solution to me, unless you expect
> the class limit to be changing incredibly frequently.
yeah i agree. Group limit(s) should not be changing so frequently.
> > perhaps
> > - Move p->load_weight to a class structure
>
> Sounds like a good idea if you can do it - but if it's per-process,
> how would it fit in the class structure?
p->load_weight essentially depends on two things:
- nice value or static priority (which is per process, already present
in task_struct)
- class limit (which is per class)
So in theory we can eliminate the load_weight field in task_struct and
compute it at runtime from the above two fields, although it will be
slightly inefficient I guess to compute the value every time a task is
added to the runqueue. If that is not desirable, then we can stick with
option 1 (walk task list and change member task's->load_weight upon class
limit change).
--
Regards,
vatsa
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
