Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Paul Menage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> On 7/11/07, Takenori Nagano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think Balbir's idea is very simple and reasonable way to develop per
>>> container
>>> swapping. Because kernel needs the information that a target page belongs
>>> to
>>> which container. Fortunately, we already had page based memory management
>>> system
>>> which included in RSS controller. I think it is appropriate that we
>>> develop per
>>> container swapping on page based memory management system.
>>>
>> So what about people who want to do per-container swapping without
>> using a page-based memory controller?
>
> Hmm, yes, I'm a few steps behind, but will what Balbir is suggesting
> prevent me from just using a per-container swapfile for checkpointing
> an application? (where the checkpoint consists of kicking out the
> dirty pages to swap and making a new copy-on-write version of the
> swapfile)
>
I don't think it should. However, it would be nice to start this effort
right away, so that we can ensure it works both for memory control
and containers.
> thanks,
> -serge
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
