On Dimarts 17 Abril 2007, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > David García Garzón wrote: > > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 18:15:09 Rui Nuno Capela wrote: > >> On Tue, April 17, 2007 15:00, David García Garzón wrote: > >>> Btw, I didn't understand which are the benefits of the current default > >>> implementation of the mouse interaction versus the QDial one. Could > >>> (any of) you explain it to me? > >> > >> One of the most annoying and rather dangerous was the fact that QDial > >> changed its value at the very first mouse click/press. If you take that > >> on live you'll see its not quite a desirable feature ;) > >> > >> Cheers. > > > > Ok, i understand. It is a very insightful reason to reimplement mouse > > interaction and i like it. > > > > But I also expected that once i do the first click the knob spins at the > > same rate i spin the mouse around the center of the widget. But it spins > > at a fixed step when you move the mouse whatever you move it faster or > > slower, it just takes the angular direction of your move but not the > > angular increment. Is it that also a feature or it is a fixable thing? > > Fixable of course. The angular interaction was a very dirty and quick > fix of mine, not as thoughtful as it should have been. It just worked > smoothly and I was satisfied with it at the time ;) > > Feel free to improve it.
The thing is that i am on the way of providing different modes of interaction. The less code to maintain the best but if you feel this progressive mode is useful at some concrete use case i could still keep it as an alternative. -- David García Garzón (Work) dgarcia at iua dot upf anotherdot es (Home) vokimon at telefonica adot net http://www.iua.upf.edu/~dgarcia
pgppefYPV8xqJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Clam-devel mailing list Clam-devel@llistes.projectes.lafarga.org https://llistes.projectes.lafarga.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clam-devel
